|
[Dealing with time during meetings] Meetings Making decisions democratically and collectively by consensus is essential to Food Not Bombs philosophy. The easiest, most common way of making this happen is to have a weekly meeting open to all, where people discuss how the group is going and how it should be going. You may find you don't need to meet that often. The key, nevertheless, is to be consistent. Meetings can be made to run more smoothly if participants are familiar with the group's general meeting process. Don't hesitate to communicate it freely with new volunteers before a meeting starts. It is best to start off by agreeing on meeting process, rather than falling into bad habits right off the bat. You might want to have a regular agenda for meetings, with some items being consistent and others being brought up as need be. Dealing with time during meetings People have been known to get frustrated when discussion about some topic becomes noting but endless banter back and forth, without real dialogue or resolution. Every topic (especially the larger, more visionary ones) need not have an immediate resolution, but if one topic seems to be dominating the meeting, perhaps tabling the issue until the following meeting would help people mull over their opinions and encourage fresh, new thinking. Note: When someone brings up an item for the agenda (in the check-in), have them suggest a time limit for that topic. When the timekeeper signals that time is up for that topic, the group decides collectively if they want to continue discussing that topic (set another time limit), bring up a proposal based on the discussion to that point, or table the issue. Here are some parts to a Food Not Bombs meeting, somewhat in order: * Check-in: Everyone introduces himself or herself,
expresses how they are doing and feeling, and adds any topics they want
to discuss to the agenda. |